Integrations
Most operations lose hours to the same thing: a person reading a number off one screen and typing it into another. Below are the systems we have actually connected in client builds — and the way we approach anything not on the list.
These are examples of work we have shipped, not a partner directory — nobody issues a badge for this and we are not implying one. Anything with a documented API is workable; these are simply the ones already done.
Marketplaces
Selling in three places means three dashboards, three inventory counts and someone reconciling them by hand on a Monday. We pull orders into the operating system as they land and push stock levels back out, so the number in the system is the number everywhere.
Accounting
The job already knows what was done, who did it, which parts were used and what was quoted. Re-entering that into accounting is transcription work, and transcription work is where the errors come from. The invoice is generated from the job and lands in the books directly.
Payments
A customer approves a quote and pays without a separate portal, a phoned-in card number, or a follow-up email chain. Reconciliation stops being a manual match between a bank line and an invoice number.
Shipping & logistics
Rate shopping, label generation and tracking numbers attached to the order they belong to — rather than a shipping tool that knows nothing about the job and a job that knows nothing about the shipment.
Documents
Signed sheets, photos, certificates and delivery notes filed against the job automatically, with the folder structure maintained by the system instead of by whoever remembered the convention.
Routing & dispatch
Geocoded job sites, travel time that informs the dispatch board, and routes a coordinator can trust — so the schedule reflects the drive, not just the clock.
Notifications
Approvals, overdue invoices, exceptions and job updates sent automatically to staff or customers, with recipients configured in Settings rather than hardcoded — so the office manager changes who gets chased, not us.
Anything else
If a system exposes an API, we can read from it and write to it. What decides whether an integration is worth building is not whether it is technically possible — it almost always is — but whether the manual work it removes is worth the surface area it adds. That is a conversation, not a feature checkbox.
Every integration starts as a person moving data between two screens. We write down the actual handoff — who does it, how often, what breaks when they are on holiday — before deciding anything technical.
Two systems holding the same fact will eventually disagree. One of them has to win. Naming which, per field, is the decision that determines whether the integration is trustworthy a year later.
Against the real service with real credentials, never a mock. An integration that works against a stub has not been shown to work.
The API will be down, rate-limited, or will reject a record. What happens then — retry, queue, or surface it to a human — is designed deliberately, because silent failure in an integration is worse than no integration.
We will not quote you a percentage of time saved before we have seen your process. Every figure of that kind on a consulting site is either measured on someone else's business or invented, and neither one tells you anything about yours. What we can do on a first call is name the handoffs we would remove and let you put your own numbers against them.